It's been a...very long,
and in some stretches seemingly endlessly unpleasant year.
But, we're finally here.
October. The weather's cooling down, there's a crispness in the night
air.
And oh yeah, Halloween.
Also that.
So, for now, that's an idea
that's being hung up. We might come back to it in the future, but for
now, it's just too much for me to properly work through.
So we're gonna make up for
quantity with quality.
This year, we're going to
be taking a franchise deep dive. Full review entries (two of which
I've covered to degrees before this), with reading up on their
backgrounds to get as much of the full experience as possible.
I should warn now that this
will get into spoiler territory, particularly with the final entry of
the month. As such, I'll do my best to keep the heaviest of spoiler
discussion behind the typical disclaimer banner.
So which franchise is it to
start things off?
You know, it's funny to me
– when I do the rankings of best/favorite horror movies, Phantasm
occasionally breaks my top five. The first four are all solid locks
while the fifth is a regular battle royale between that, Rosemary's
Baby, and The Shining. Despite that, if asked to pick my
overall favorite horror franchise, it's the one that comes out on top
for me.
As fun facts go, unless someone has a better name for it,
the overall theme for this month's project is currently
OctoBOOOOOOOOOY
the overall theme for this month's project is currently
OctoBOOOOOOOOOY
There's a few reasons for that. The first, and one of the most direct, is probably the fact that it's one of the ones where I feel the overall holds up. Yes, there's other bigger franchises, some with overall stronger entries in them, but as much as I love movies like The Exorcist, Alien, and The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, their overall franchises have points of “...it's too bad about that one.”
Interestingly two other
franchises I feel avoid this “...although” problem also share
this mext trait in common with this series – over five movies and
almost forty years, Phantasm has managed to largely keep its
core creative team behind it – even when Coscarelli bowed out of
directing the final movie, he was onhand to help make it. The only
other time that core group was altered in any way was the studio
mandate of replacing A Michael Baldwin with James LeGros for the
second movie, and even that was subsequently reversed from 3 onward.
With how many franchises change hands and subsequently lose any sense
of cohesive theme or creative through line, there's something
admirable about the ones that manage to stay with the same team all
the way to the end goals.
For those wondering, the
other two franchises I was referring to were Sam Raimi's Evil Dead
trilogy and George Romero's Dead trilogy. Granted, some will
debate this stance in light of things like Fede Alvarez's
remake/sequel for ED and many of the more estranged post-Day
Romero movies, but as the initial 'core' trilogies, they remained
solidly in the hands of their creators.
Finally, I'm genuinely
fascinated by the strange world this series grew and created. With
weird segues into nightmares, zombie dwarves, and an extradimensional
mortician as its primary antagonist, played by the late great Angus
Scrimm, the series is still a unique breed of weird horror, and since
it never became a huge blockbuster, one that never got subjected to
waves of imitators. On top of that, that same core cast and crew have
given the series its own sense of heart and even family to go with
all the weirdness. I'm still trying to rack my brain for many other
comparable experiences in horror cinema and haven't had much luck.
There's something genuinely admirable to the man's being
completely game to play this role right up to the final years
of his life. Rest in peace, Mr. Scrimm.
We'll see as the month goes
on, but in the meantime, hopefully you guys will join me on this
weird thirty-seven year jaunt through the space gate.
The review for the first
Phantasm will be going up later this week.
See you then.
No comments:
Post a Comment