Body Snatchers (1993) - Well, THIS Got Scarier With Time

Welcome back. You're just in time for a fresh round of pods.

Now, you WILL remember to keep these properly watered in your rooms, right?

Look, I'm just concerned is all. I'm still seeing some emotions and I think these plants could help.

...wait. Let me try that again.

ANYWAY, we're jumping ahead in time, this time by fifteen years. It's a new generation and a new kind of Body Snatcher, this time with a new title, and a new director in the form of Abel Ferrara (which was weird for me to remember coming in this time with memories of Bad Lieutenant and Ms. 45.)

There IS still a fair amount of unsettling nonsexual nudity
but nothing quite on the level of Harvey Keitel's breakdown scene.

As an evolution of story, Body Snatchers differs considerably from either of the two prior movies. The pod people are still there, and function in much the same way as in the previous versions, but that is about it. In this case, the medical examiner hero of the past two movies is now a secondary, with the movie instead focusing on his daughter (played by a young Gabrielle Anwar) as the family is moved out to investigate strange goings-on an army base.

If you haven't figured out where it goes from there, well...I don't know what to tell you except keep taking care of those plants. It'll be over soon.

As I've said a few times now, one of the things that's fascinating about this series is how its core idea is adaptable, able to change itself to fit the themes and fears of whenever it is made, whether by design or simple happenstance.

In this case - well, welcome to a post Gulf War brand of pod people.

With that in mind, as some of you have already likely picked up on – Ferrara's decision to set the movie on an army base is a major part of where this movie is going thematically. This is probably the most thematically pointed of the four takes on the story produced to date – by the time Marti (Anwar) and her family arrive at the base, the pods have already taken over much of the populace. Thanks to the tendency of military culture to lean heavily on conformity, this change in the social structure isn't registered right away. Much of it is simply treated as standard army culture rather than an indication of shed humanity.

Okay, so it's not particularly subtle, but then no rule stated it had to be. For what it's worth though, Ferrara mostly conveys it well. At times it can be a little too on the nose (such as a sequence involving Marti's little brother in school where the students' art projects are all the exact same drawing) but even then, it doesn't feel like the movie slows to beat you over the head with it.

One other area where this particular version stands out – while not as uniquely grim as its 78 predecessor, Body Snatchers is arguably the entry in the series that could be described as the most overtly horror-based. Much more time is spent on sequences of people being taken over by pods – up to and including seeing the fate of a human fully taken over within the first act, a reveal previously kept till near the ending. It's understandable in some ways – by this point, the concept of the pod person was already a part of our cultural lexicon, so Ferrara didn't have to play it as coy, the audience already knew what it was getting into.

To its credit, the quick cut presentation of the scene still
makes for a pretty unsettling first reveal, even if you
know what's coming.

This more open approach to the creature and body horror leads to arguably the movie's strongest sequence – an extended scene in which soldier Tim (Billy Wirth), feigning being a pod, has to work his way through an army hospital that has been turned into a conversion center. Ferrara keeps the focus predominantly on Tim and the occasional looks at what he sees, and all the while we hear sounds of soldiers screaming as they're restrained and sedated or the sick, wet sounds of bodies collapsing as they're fully taken over. It manages to be both blatant but also careful enough to make sure it doesn't over play any one visual, creating an altogether disturbing tableau, made all the more effective by the extra challenge that Tim is required to keep a straight face through all of it.

Following this fairly nightmarish scene, we get an ending that is, to this point, probably the closest thing to an upbeat end (give or take for the studio mandated ending to 56, that is.) Of course, even that ending is laced with heavy ambiguity that the pods have already outpaced the survivors, and it's only a matter of time before they escape from one threat into another.

A threat that, in this version, makes the idea of sleeping
even MORE unsettling.

Overall, Ferrara's take remains an interesting one. There's no denying it's a movie with something to say, even if it's at times a bit too blunt about what it's saying, but it also still keeps its story moving, even while it's making sure you don't miss the point. The end result isn't quite as to-the-bone unsettling as its predecessor, but it still manages a fair number of unsettling jolts all on its own.

I still don't know if I can agree with Roger Ebert's assessment that this was the best of the three. In fact, as it is now, I think I'd put it third in line – though less from any fault of its own and more just preference for the first two in their approach. Even with that placing, this still works well as a fresh take.

Also, given what followed the 90s, a dark commentary on the enforced conformity of military culture, particularly with an emphasis on the threat of it eventually working its way off base and weaving its way among civilians as well that feels uncomfortably prescient, so it's got that going for it.

Three for three so far and each has been enjoyable experiences, with something unique to say for them.

Now comes...well...we'll get to The Invasion next time.

With a comment like that, I suppose I've already tipped my hand about what I thought about it, huh?

Well, you'll get to hear me explain that more next time.

ARE YOU ASLEEP YET?
JUST CHECKING

Till then.