Death is but a door, time a window, and horror franchises
have never stopped because their villain was killed off before, so once again,
we return to the Damien-less world of The Omen.
This has been an interesting month for me. I
stand by my opinion that Damien: Omen II and The Final Conflict are both movies
that could have been more than they were, but it was still interesting to find
the good elements in them along with the shortcomings.
Watching this movie in light of that, I have to wonder if I
have a monkey’s paw on me somewhere, because this sequel feels like it decided
to address the horror shortage in the worst way possible.
This project was pitched to revive the Omen franchise for TV.
I’ve seen accounts claiming it was just for this series, others saying this was
testing the water for television revivals of other Fox film series. To his
credit, Harvey Bernhard stuck around, feeling there was still some
life in the brand. An optimistic view, considering the last movie ended with
its central villain dead and the literal Second Coming under way.
Where did they go from that? Just pretending it didn’t
happen, apparently, instead jumping ahead a few years to this film’s new
unsuspecting parents, played by Faye Grant and Michael Woods. She’s a retired
lawyer, he’s an up and coming local politician, and they decide to adopt a
child. Enter the newest Satanic offspring, Delia, played by Asia Vieria. As you
can imagine, deaths grounded and insane ensue.
As you might be guessing, yes, the answer to ‘where do you
go when you’ve killed the Antichrist?’ is ‘soft reboot with HIS kid’.
Whose earliest scenes include her biting a Barbie doll's face and leaving teeth marks.
No one will EVER suspect!
The sad thing is, on paper, this could have worked. It
would be a shift after how much they wed the first trilogy to following the
Biblical playbook, but it could be done. I can even see potential in flipping the first movie’s ‘father-son’ dynamic to ‘mother-daughter’ and how
that could change the nature of the relationship being tested.
As is so often the case, however, execution is a factor. On that front,
this attempt just…yeah.
Delia is the best place to start. For a series that
established itself on the idea that a seemingly innocent child could be the
devil’s spawn, this movie isn’t interested in hiding the fact Delia is evil –
with frequent glares at just about everyone, open antagonism, and a first half
that reads less like The Omen and more like The Bad Seed with powers, this
movie carries itself with a level of subtlety that, to its credit, would play
well in a parody, but doesn’t work as well if you’re trying to for something
serious.
Not that this movie seems to have an especially strong sense
of its tone to begin with. Part of this is likely thanks to the fact they
changed directors mid-stream, starting the project under the direction of
Dominique Othenin-Girard (whose other big horror claim to fame is Halloween 5:
The Revenge of Michael Myers) before he was replaced mid-way by Jorge Montesi
(whose biggest claim to fame MIGHT be Mother, May I Sleep With Danger? make of
that what you will.) Whether this was a problem at the initial script level or
with the directorial change, the movie makes some wild sweeps, such as in an
early scene that goes from Delia antagonizing a bully in a Bad Seed-style
display of open humiliation that then shifts into a scene of his said bully’s
father being beheaded in a car accident – said beheading isn’t shown, but the
directorial cue to indicate it is…well…see below.
Credit where it's due, I think this may be the first time in this franchise that a director thought 'What if we make a kill funny?'
The set pieces only get weirder from there with an extended
subplot involving new age healers that detect Delia’s evil
through her aura, a faith healing that goes awry, and a detective storyline
that leads to what might be the most unintentionally comic death of the entire
series, culminating in a reveal that made it clear they were really hoping
this would pave the way for more sequels that just didn’t land.
I should be up front – I came into this movie actively
trying to find some good for it. I wanted to be able to avoid completely
dragging on the film, as cathartic as that would be. The problem is,
outside of unachieved potential, there isn’t much I can give this. The
casting isn’t too bad, and I was pleased to see the supporting roles including familiar
faces in character actors Don S. Davis and Michael Lerner, but
even they can only do just so much. Lerner is arguably the brightest spot
in this, and that still gets undercut by the fact his final scene is downright
ludicrous in how it plays out.
I could probably do a much more thorough breakdown of this
movie’s failings, but again, with minimal good to bolster that, at this point
it would just be so much public flogging of a movie that it could be argued has
already paid for its crimes. Outside of completism, the best I could give is
that this does at least have some camp value. Not enough that I see it getting
a second life as a so-bad-it’s-good, but at least enough that there are worse
ways you could spend 90 minutes and change.
Next up, we come to one I will admit that, before this, I
hadn’t seen since it was in theaters. It will be interesting to see if my
memory deceives me and maybe the 2006 remake of The Omen (AKA The Omen: 666,
stick a pin in that now, because it WILL be discussed) is better than I
remember.
Or at least manages to be better than this.
Will see soon.
Till then.
Till then.
P.S. So, just as a teaser for the 31st here,
guys. Next to these two movies, the last two books are looking a whole lot
better than I expected. Will explain soon!
No comments:
Post a Comment